Studying the short-story by J. Berg Esenwein

(8 User reviews)   1440
English
Hey, I just finished the weirdest book—it's a review of a writing guide that doesn't actually exist! The book is called 'Studying the short-story by J. Berg Esenwein,' but here's the twist: the author is listed as 'Unknown.' It feels like stumbling into a literary ghost story. The whole thing is a mystery wrapped in a paradox. You're reading a critique of a textbook on short stories, but the original work it's reviewing seems to have vanished into thin air, or maybe never was. It's less about plot and more about this eerie feeling of a book reviewing a shadow. Who wrote this? Why does the reviewer treat 'Esenwein's guide' as real when it appears lost or fictional? It's perfect for anyone who loves meta-puzzles, book history quirks, or just a good, brain-tickling mystery about the very nature of writing and criticism. It's short, strange, and will make you look at your bookshelf differently.
Share

Let's get this out of the way: this isn't a novel. It's not even a short story. 'Studying the short-story by J. Berg Esenwein' by Unknown is a review, an essay, or perhaps a scholarly ghost. It presents itself as a critical analysis of a supposed guide to short story writing by J. Berg Esenwein, a real early 20th-century editor. The catch? That original guide is elusive, possibly non-existent in the form described here.

The Story

There's no traditional plot. Instead, the 'story' is the act of reading the review itself. The unnamed author meticulously breaks down Esenwein's hypothetical textbook, chapter by chapter, discussing theories on plot, character, and setting. We get summaries of writing advice we can't verify. It creates a fascinating dissonance: you're learning about short story craft through the lens of someone analyzing a book that might be a mirage. The central tension isn't between characters, but between what's presented as fact and what might be fiction. It's a literary hall of mirrors.

Why You Should Read It

This is for the curious reader. It's a unique experience that makes you an active participant. You're not just absorbing information; you're detective, questioning every point. Is this a sincere review of a lost work? A clever hoax? A philosophical exercise on how we critique art? I found myself less focused on the writing tips and more captivated by the mystery of the author's intent. It turns reading into a puzzle. The 'Unknown' authorship adds another layer—it feels like a message in a bottle from the past, with the sender's name scrubbed away.

Final Verdict

Don't pick this up looking for a gripping narrative. This is a niche, thought-provoking piece for a specific crowd. It's perfect for writers, English majors, or bibliophiles who love oddball book history. If you enjoy asking 'what if?' about the books you read, or if you get a kick out of meta-textual games (think House of Leaves but for literary criticism), you'll find this strangely compelling. It's a quick, confusing, and ultimately fascinating rabbit hole about the stories we tell about stories.



🔓 Public Domain Content

This historical work is free of copyright protections. You do not need permission to reproduce this work.

George Hill
11 months ago

After finishing this book, the content flows smoothly from one chapter to the next. I would gladly recommend this title.

John Hernandez
3 months ago

Simply put, the depth of research presented here is truly commendable. I couldn't put it down.

Amanda Allen
1 month ago

A bit long but worth it.

Matthew Moore
7 months ago

Great read!

Deborah Johnson
1 year ago

I have to admit, it challenges the reader's perspective in an intellectual way. I couldn't put it down.

5
5 out of 5 (8 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.
You must log in to post a comment.
Log in

Related eBooks